Dr Orrin Franko MD2
1Lead App Editor, Journal of Mobile Technology in Medicine, 2Dept of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, USA.
Corresponding Author: ofranko@ucsd.edu
Journal MTM 1:2:1-4, 2012
doi:10.7309/jmtm.9
The last two years have demonstrated an exponential growth in the use of smartphones and tablets by medical professionals, a trend that has led to medical apps developed specifically for patients and physicians.1-71. Azark R. Smartphone apps for your practice. CDS Rev 2011;104:12-13.
2. Bhansali R, Armstrong J. Smartphone applications for pediatric anesthesia. Paediatr Anaesth 2012;22:400-404.
3. Franko OI. Smartphone apps for orthopaedic surgeons. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2011;469:2042-2048.
4. Franko OI, Bhola S. iPad apps for orthopedic surgeons. Orthopedics 2011;34:978-981.
5. Oehler RL, Smith K, Toney JF. Infectious diseases resources for the iPhone. Clin Infect Dis 2010;50:1268-1274.
6. Rosser BA, Eccleston C. Smartphone applications for pain management. J Telemed Telecare 2011;17:308-312.
7. Franko OI, Tirrell TF. Smartphone App Use Among Medical Providers in ACGME Training Programs. J Med Syst 2011. Not surprisingly, because most app developers are unverified sources of medical information, recent publications have emphasized the importance of peer-review validation.7-107. Franko OI, Tirrell TF. Smartphone App Use Among Medical Providers in ACGME Training Programs. J Med Syst 2011.
8. Boulos MN, Wheeler S, Tavares C, Jones R. How smartphones are changing the face of mobile and participatory healthcare: an overview, with example from eCAALYX. Biomed Eng Online 2011;10:24.
9. Hamilton AD, Brady RR. Medical Professional Involvement in Smartphone Apps in Dermatology. Br J Dermatol 2012.
10. Kabachinski J. Mobile medical apps changing healthcare technology. Biomed Instrum Technol 2011;45:482-486. In addition to safety concerns, the validation of mobile apps in the health care setting provides an opportunity for younger physicians, often medical students and residents, to contribute to the medical community by demonstrating the efficacy and validity of these new technologies. However, many trainees and practicing physicians are unfamiliar with scientific validation methodology. This editorial outlines a structure that can be used to assist with the design, execution, and publication of a validation study for mobile technology.
Validation refers to proving a tool’s ability to report the absolute “truth” as much as it can be measured. Various forms of validity exist that, when combined, allow a tool to be considered “valid” by the medical community. To clarify various forms of validation, I will share examples from the current literature, which can serve as guides for providers interested in designing a study of their own.
Read More